<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Here&#8217;s looking at you, Olympus EP-2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.david-kennedy.com/2010/04/20/heres-looking-at-you-olympus-ep-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.david-kennedy.com/2010/04/20/heres-looking-at-you-olympus-ep-2/</link>
	<description>blog.david-kennedy.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 20:37:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://blog.david-kennedy.com/2010/04/20/heres-looking-at-you-olympus-ep-2/comment-page-1/#comment-940</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 01:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.david-kennedy.com/?p=1706#comment-940</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got that latest 1.4 update and I really haven&#039;t had the chance to try it outdoors. (Can you tell why?)

Maybe I came off as too harsh. I&#039;ll experiment a bit more with the new firmware and see how things go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got that latest 1.4 update and I really haven&#8217;t had the chance to try it outdoors. (Can you tell why?)</p>
<p>Maybe I came off as too harsh. I&#8217;ll experiment a bit more with the new firmware and see how things go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://blog.david-kennedy.com/2010/04/20/heres-looking-at-you-olympus-ep-2/comment-page-1/#comment-938</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 20:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.david-kennedy.com/?p=1706#comment-938</guid>
		<description>Scott,
I think you&#039;re being too hard on the &lt;em&gt;idea&lt;/em&gt; of contrast-detect AF, rather than Olympus&#039; implementation of it.  Panasonic&#039;s AF is &lt;em&gt;very&lt;/em&gt; responsive.  Also, have you tried their &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.olympus-europa.com/consumer/208_7226.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;firmware 1.1&lt;/a&gt;?  It is supposed to reduce the lethargy exhibited by the PEN&#039;s autofocus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,<br />
I think you&#8217;re being too hard on the <em>idea</em> of contrast-detect AF, rather than Olympus&#8217; implementation of it.  Panasonic&#8217;s AF is <em>very</em> responsive.  Also, have you tried their <a href="http://www.olympus-europa.com/consumer/208_7226.htm" rel="nofollow">firmware 1.1</a>?  It is supposed to reduce the lethargy exhibited by the PEN&#8217;s autofocus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://blog.david-kennedy.com/2010/04/20/heres-looking-at-you-olympus-ep-2/comment-page-1/#comment-936</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.david-kennedy.com/?p=1706#comment-936</guid>
		<description>I find myself pondering if the lack of a precise spot focus is due to the contrast-detect AF and possibly the need for a steady point of reference to detect the contrast. Maybe it&#039;s not such a concern and I&#039;m just not very familiar with the technology.

Also bothering me about the focus on the Olympus is the need to focus in/out/in every time. This is one area a professional SLR is vastly superior to the point I&#039;m wondering if Contrast AF will ever be able to match its accuracy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find myself pondering if the lack of a precise spot focus is due to the contrast-detect AF and possibly the need for a steady point of reference to detect the contrast. Maybe it&#8217;s not such a concern and I&#8217;m just not very familiar with the technology.</p>
<p>Also bothering me about the focus on the Olympus is the need to focus in/out/in every time. This is one area a professional SLR is vastly superior to the point I&#8217;m wondering if Contrast AF will ever be able to match its accuracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://blog.david-kennedy.com/2010/04/20/heres-looking-at-you-olympus-ep-2/comment-page-1/#comment-930</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.david-kennedy.com/?p=1706#comment-930</guid>
		<description>Hi, Scott,
The focus on Olympus&#039; PEN series is, in the words of Michael Reichmann, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/ep2.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;lethargic&lt;/a&gt;.  (So far, I would agree with all of Reichmann&#039;s criticisms and praises for the camera.)

Originally, Olympus claimed that this problem would be solved by improving the firmware of the lenses, but I believe it&#039;s the autofocus system within the PEN body itself.

Coming from the Panasonic Lumix G1, it is an adjustment.  The contrast-detection focusing on that camera feels &lt;em&gt;almost &lt;/em&gt;as fast as a standard SLR using phase-detection autofocus, and it is &lt;em&gt;worlds &lt;/em&gt;beyond its Olympus counterpart.  Sorry, Olympus, but it&#039;s true.

That said, the Olympus bodies have some interesting advantages, foremost being that the image stabilization is built into the body.  I am also impressed at the quality of the EP-2&#039;s accessory electronic viewfinder.  Before looking through it, I thought that the G1 (and GH1) had the best EVF&#039;s.  Then again, I have not yet seen a Lumix G2 (recently announced) to see if the EVF has evolved--I would think that it has.

Cheers,
David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Scott,<br />
The focus on Olympus&#8217; PEN series is, in the words of Michael Reichmann, <a href="http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/ep2.shtml" rel="nofollow">lethargic</a>.  (So far, I would agree with all of Reichmann&#8217;s criticisms and praises for the camera.)</p>
<p>Originally, Olympus claimed that this problem would be solved by improving the firmware of the lenses, but I believe it&#8217;s the autofocus system within the PEN body itself.</p>
<p>Coming from the Panasonic Lumix G1, it is an adjustment.  The contrast-detection focusing on that camera feels <em>almost </em>as fast as a standard SLR using phase-detection autofocus, and it is <em>worlds </em>beyond its Olympus counterpart.  Sorry, Olympus, but it&#8217;s true.</p>
<p>That said, the Olympus bodies have some interesting advantages, foremost being that the image stabilization is built into the body.  I am also impressed at the quality of the EP-2&#8242;s accessory electronic viewfinder.  Before looking through it, I thought that the G1 (and GH1) had the best EVF&#8217;s.  Then again, I have not yet seen a Lumix G2 (recently announced) to see if the EVF has evolved&#8211;I would think that it has.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://blog.david-kennedy.com/2010/04/20/heres-looking-at-you-olympus-ep-2/comment-page-1/#comment-929</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.david-kennedy.com/?p=1706#comment-929</guid>
		<description>My biggest beef is the lack of a more precise focus point. When you find yourself shooting, say, between a closer object with a narrow opening but you want to focus behind that you simply cannot with this camera. Heck, I was in the back of a room trying to photograph a guy speaking to a room of seated people and half the time it focused on the seated people&#039;s head despite that being the bottom of the focus area. (This may just be a limitation of contrast focus, that it currently has trouble focusing on such a fine point that they had to make the focus area relatively large?) So the focus is very finicky but hopefully it will continue to evolve beyond little problems like this. How is it on the G1?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My biggest beef is the lack of a more precise focus point. When you find yourself shooting, say, between a closer object with a narrow opening but you want to focus behind that you simply cannot with this camera. Heck, I was in the back of a room trying to photograph a guy speaking to a room of seated people and half the time it focused on the seated people&#8217;s head despite that being the bottom of the focus area. (This may just be a limitation of contrast focus, that it currently has trouble focusing on such a fine point that they had to make the focus area relatively large?) So the focus is very finicky but hopefully it will continue to evolve beyond little problems like this. How is it on the G1?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

